| |
|
|
Managers
have to carefully analyze the market conditions and find out
how sensitive their products are with respect to price and other
marketing-mix variables. Only after fully understanding these
sensitivities, can managers at P&G make the optimal strategic
decisions regarding, (a) what is the optimum price, distribution
and sizing combination to get maximum value, and (b) how to
gain market share from their competitors without cannibalizing
their own brands. The task of measuring these sensitivities
and converting them into optimal decisions is critical to every
firm.
We use advanced modeling approaches to answer the above questions
for P&G Asia-Pacific. We measured the price and distribution
elasticities for all their detergents in one of the most populated
countries in the world by developing a system of equations based
sales response models and up-tiering models (to evaluate the
draw of sales from the lower tier competitiors). In order to
incorporate the cross-sectional differences in the overall response
coefficients and the heterogeneity in response for different
SKU and States, we use a three-step random coefficient regression
(RCR) approach to estimate the models. In the process of model
development and estimation, we also dervive the properties of
the weighted RCR estimators in the case of a system of equations
which is a key contribution in this paper. Our models allow
for price parameters to vary over time. These models are built
to see which of P&G brand’s marketing-mix variables and
competition factors have significant effects on the sales volume
of P&G brands. Based on our model results, we develop Sales
volume and value simulators for Tide and Ariel. These simulators
enable the marketing managers at P& G to develop the best
pricing/distribution/sizing strategy instantly, find out which
competitive brands and SKUs they are actually competing with,
and develop proactive marketing strategies to manage revenue/value
growth. As a result, P&G gained over 39 million dollars
in value growth over a one year period because of the implementation
of the recommendations from our modeling approach.
|
|